Videos by ComicBook.com
This was made readily apparent in the first sequel, The Lost World: Jurassic Park. It was seen as a disappointment in the late ’90s and, if watching it now, it certainly still is a disappointment. But only compared to the original film. Compared to all the films that came later, it’s undoubtedly superior.
What Makes The Lost World: Jurassic Park the Best of the Sequels?

Especially with the benefit of hindsight, it’s clear that The Lost World did, in fact, capture some of the original film’s magic. It basically is a re-creation of the first movie but with the stakes upped. The adventurous tone is still there, but it’s mostly replaced with horror vibes. Spielberg knew the wonder couldn’t be felt twice, so why not give the audience more of what they wanted. In fact, a lot more of what they wanted.
That’s what The Lost World is: more, more, more. There aren’t just three Velociraptors on the prowl, there are so many we never receive an exact count (likely a dozen at the very least). There isn’t just one T. rex, there are two, and they’re ripping The West Wing‘s Toby Ziegler in half as he heroically saves his friends.
That latter part of the sentence explains a few things about The Lost World. In terms of appealing to a young audience, which every Jurassic movie has actively done (while also appealing to the older crowd and everyone in between), this first sequel is a little much for kids. The aforementioned death of Richard Schiff’s Eddie Carr is pretty horrifying stuff, even when watching the movie as an adult. Not only the fact that he’s yanked in two, but also because of the fact that he’s frantically doing all he can to save the protagonists (dangling over a cliff in a mobile lab). We like Carr, we don’t want Carr to die, but he does, and in a clearly painful way.








